Vladimir Shchur
Vladimir Shchur
Some crazy thoughts: 1) Stacktrace starts from `FSharpAsync.RunSynchronously` which was removed in 4.25 that might or might not be an issue 2) Next location has `System.Exception.get_StackTrace()` in the middle, so...
@MangelMaxime Unfortunately, is still doesn't work with Oxpecker.Solid plugin ``` Could not scan C:/Users/DavidFaivre/.nuget/packages/oxpecker.solid.fableplugin/0.7.0/lib/net6.0/Oxpecker.Solid.FablePlugin.dll for Fable plugins, skipping this assembly. Original error: The exception has been reported. This intern al...
@MangelMaxime I reproduced the issue in clean folder downloaded from github as zip file, however didn't reproduce in a repo folder, which is pretty weird. I'll try to dig deeper...
@MangelMaxime Just verified several times in clean folders that `EmptySolid` doesn't work neither with plugin built from sources (develop branch) nor downloaded from nuget (main branch) because of the aforementioned...
@MangelMaxime I've decided to try Fable 5 with .NET 10 and it still fails for me with a similar error ``` Fable compilation finished in 3740ms Unhandled exception. System.IO.FileNotFoundException: Could...
@goswinr it does work with `5.0.0-alpha.19` and `5.0.0-alpha.18`! It doesn't work with `5.0.0-alpha.17` and below. And actually I was hoping for it to work because of [this change](https://github.com/fable-compiler/Fable/pull/4275/files#diff-1cba6b2273be8c5c1c218838688ce78d3f5d3a285a38dc97869995e64579454b). So, it...
@T-Gro It was rather an explanation why using reflection in F# is important :) The motivation is just replacing even more error-prone code, that we have to write today. For...
@Happypig375 thank you for the detailed explanation! I understand that the original issues are different, however I think that this suggestion should stay, because those issues are quite low-level and...
@T-Gro you are probably right, I've always unconditionally thought about access to private fields as a reflection, and this idea was supported by the performance articles where this attribute was...