Ladislav Thon
Ladislav Thon
The specification and TCK for this are done. We ended up removing transformers and wrappers from CDI 4.1, those should get specified in a future version, but the main functionality...
I do think this is intended, because it affects how the javadoc is rendered, but I haven't been here since the beginning, so it's just my guess :-)
I'd repurpose this to: we need to have a proper linter in the CDI project (and the TCK).
The core profile seems to include EL, so that dependency shouldn't be an issue?
Ah I forgot about that divergence. I only looked at the first link. If the core profile doesn't include EL, exclusion should be possible, but I agree it's not nice.
I meant EL should be a compile-only dependency of CDI in the Core profile, and the Core profile "uberPOM" should add an exclusion of EL to the CDI dependency. Of...
We discussed this briefly on the CDI call today and there's a pretty straightforward way: 1. Create a separate module that would depend on EL. 2. Add an interface to...
I drafted a solution for this here: #644
I agree with @mkouba's comments in the original issue -- the existing CDI API for programmatically looking up `InjectionPoint` is sufficient. The spec should clarify that this is possible, but...
I agree we forgot to make the context objects easily available at runtime, and we should add a method to `BeanContainer` for that. Something like this: ```java /** * Obtains...