David Lindauer

hm I looked at the docs for dll tool. Looks like you would use either olink or oimplib to get most of the functionality. (oimplib does the conversions to and...

given the way `fsync` is written , I imagine this would just be a wrapper for `fsync`. would that be useful?

i don't think i wrote the fsync, but all it does is duplicate the handle then close the duplicated handle. I don't even know if that is correct, e.g. should...

the current version of fsync just dups the handle and closes the dup, which I assume writes the file system buffers to disk. That says nothing about what is stored...

@chuggafan, I was wondering if you had time and interest to try to make some sort of test harness for this? Makefiles or whatever you think necessary? I was thinking...

@chuggafan - i took a break from the optimizer problems to research this. The LIT tool uses python but the libcxx tests don't use CMAKE... so I put #603 in...

ok thanks I appreciate it! I added the files, you should be able to go into \orangec\src and do > omake -flibcxxtests.mak I put the tests in a folder near...

you can get python here if you don't already have it: [https://www.python.org/](https://www.python.org/)

well we are about to do c++17 so I wouldn't want to limit it to just c++14... anyway occ doesn't really differentiate between the different C++ standards, the plan is...

yeah my main problem is there is a lot of work involved in figuring out the differences between all the versions... some of them are very subtle I think. And...