David Lindauer

this is loosely related to #252... the only reason I can think of to support multiple manglers is for linux support!

thank you for marking the ones you don't need rushed as the milestone is getting a lot of issues and it would be helpful to start cutting back what I...

trying to wrap my head around coroutines lol

ok sounds good... i agree concepts and modules will be a big deal. Not sure about coroutines it didn't seem so bad. But I'll move it in a bit :smile:

yeah that looks like an interesting thing to do... and I don't think it would be too hard either. Don't know that we should touch it while you've got omake...

I looked at the documentation for #pragma exit and while it is similar to #pragma rundown, I think I may have the priorites backwards... may have to rework that... I...

while I agree with you @claunia it could be done with a rewrite to the backend (or perhaps an entirely new backend dedicated to this purpose) and maybe some minor...

@claunia, the main problem with this compiler is it has got to keep things in a format that can be passed to unmanaged code, that is the primary complication for...

@claunia ok let me see what I can do about the problems DotPeek references. Probably there is another way to do what is being done there... I'll also see what...

@gitmensch thanks I forgot to comment on the PDB issue. We have an issue for PDBs already #252, which is to get done in milestone5. I had offered to fix...