Kuldeep Borkar
Kuldeep Borkar
> This kind of thing can happen where a function is not really supposed to accept string input but does so implicitly because of the use of `sympify` without `strict=True`...
I think, the results differ when in the code `.to_unify` is used or the domains are change using `.to_field` and `.to_ring` like in the functions `div, rem, quo, exquo etc.`...
Can we continue to remove #doctest: +SKIP if found at particular places, actually I found one place in `sympy/stats/rv.py` that its okay to remove and run `./bin/test` and no fails...
@CaedenPH I think I have made a mistake while updating the repo and merging conflicts and somehow that other change of Binary tree came ; ( I am trying to...
@CaedenPH Oh! I think I actually added this earlier 15 days ago but didn't receive any reviews and now it is implemented 😿
@leandromoreira , @jbochi If this has not been implemented yet can I implement the same with test cases in a new PR??
@alecloudenback `all( cf -> sign(cf) == sign(first(cfs)), cfs)` I am not getting it ; ( how this would work because if I used it doing something like this: ``` function...
I don't know the reason why the build is failing ; (
@alecloudenback can you please explain a bit more of which functions more test cases needs to be added in which file or with a particular example please? I am trying...
@alecloudenback Okay I will try to read some textbooks solve some problems and then write some more good test cases from the next time.