Kristoffer Carlsson
Kristoffer Carlsson
Looks fast again on https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/46075.
The next step here is for someone to identify the commit that fixed the issue (perhaps via a bisect) and then it can be backported to 1.6.
Should be fixed on https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/41554. Thanks for the bisect @anaveragehuman
Unfortunately, the fix for this issue caused another problem so it cannot be backported to 1.6.
> but #42007 is a performance problem and this is a correctness problem. So, if #39980 solves this issue, I think this gives us more motivation to actually backport this?...
Okay, that seems bad enough for them to debug it themselves.
I think this is fixed in Julia 1.6.
Yeah, I merged a test that failed on 1.6 at a time when we didn't have 1.6 CI. It is a bit tricky to make this conditional on the julia...
I'm not sure how this happens. If possible, it would be good to try to reduce it a bit to see if it is some specific package that causes it...
I intentionally have not really gone much into the whole distribution aspect with PackageCompiler because it is a very big area. So I think some other package that handles that...