Kevin Ransom (msft)

@dsyme clearly F# has had this behaviour for ever, do we really want to restrict operator type member visibility to public members. 

It looks like the required descriptions exist here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fsharp/language-reference/fsharp-interactive-options

I will fix it, it is a bug not a feature request.

> Before we proceed to merging it, as part of review, we need to make sure the section 12.5.1 of the spec, "Execution of Static Initializers" still true in new...

/run fantomas

> Does this have changes on where closures are defined? @TIHan no. It just moves where the code is generated to a type nested where it is visible rather than...

> Real visibility used together with signature files. > > What is the default visibility for symbols used only in implementation .fs and never exposed via the signature .fsi ?...

@vzarytovskii yes

I closed a bunch of bugs created prior to 2018 --- because they are unlikely to get worked on.