KarinG

I just kicked off the test by pushing a trivial commit to your `participant-count-deux` branch.

Ah cool on the test! If needed we can bring this over the finish line in Montreal!

Yes - unrelated -> it's a leap year failure!

That leap year issue has been dealt with. Kicking off the tests again!

Ok that passed... I need a screenshot.

Ok that was the wrong test! Billing fields now updated for legacy and exporting a png.

Ok - D10 passes - so that ACH label edit was it. Can't merge until there is an iATS release.

Hi @sluc23 - technically -> we're not opposed to making these edits - but is `private` sufficient? Should it not be `public`? I also read through the previous issue write...

@pradpnayak - we're D9/D10 first, so please PR to 6.x - so that it will run the extensive test matrix on it. After we see that PR through -> then...

What's that section of code like in D9? Is this PR a direct backport?