Kartik Khare

Closing this in favor of #15831

@mcvsubbu @sajjad-moradi it would be better if we synced up offline on this. Can you let us know your availability in the OSS slack #feat-pausless-consumption channel

@cbi42 is there a way if we don't rely on WriteBufferManager but instead flush the memtables ourselves. The only hiccup I see is accurately tracking the memtable size because afaik...

@Jackie-Jiang 14309 won't handle the case where .hasNext() itself fails. I understand this is backward incompatible. I think the main thing we want to do is use lineIterator by default...

@Jackie-Jiang the difference is this doesn't throw exception when the line is corrupt there still might be rare case when it fails but its much much safer than existing iterator...

@abhioncbr yeah you are right, let me see what other dependencies can we pull