KFuzzing

Thank you for your reply. I hope I can make some contributions to AFL++. I am also continuing to refine the strategy for KFUZZ.

Based on the current experimental results, different versions of AFL++ show noticeable performance differences on some programs. Since the initial seed count for `lcms_cms_transform_fuzzer` is less than 2, KFUZZ's strategy...

I think so too. I will finish it as soon as possible.

I have updated KFUZZ to the current AFL++ dev code state and added some changes (new flag `-H`). Maybe we can run two versions of KFUZZ: (1) with `-k`; (2)...

Hi @vanhauser-thc, I found the you use the wrong link of KFUZZ in `builder.Dockerfile`. The right setting is `git clone https://github.com/KFuzzing/AFLplusplus /afl` instead of `git clone https://github.com/KFuzzing/KFuzz /afl`. `KFuzzing/KFuzz` is...

In the attachment, I provided the settings for the fuzzers in FuzzBench, which you can refer to. All the fuzzers are based on AFL++'s a11488b9dcc71e5b52876e8c11ea6ee231e433ba. [fuzzers.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/17459234/fuzzers.zip)

It looks like the experiments have run successfully based on the log in [2024-10-21-aflpp](https://storage.googleapis.com/fuzzbench-data/index.html?prefix=2024-10-21-aflpp/) , but I can not find the corresponding report. Could you please have a look? Thank...

> that is a fuzzbench issue I have seen before. once the run is finished it will pop up, 1-2 more days. Thanks!

I'm not sure if there is an issue with my recent code changes. Could you help me run another comparison experiment? [fuzzers-2.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/17514605/fuzzers-2.zip)

Thank you for your help. The results don't look as expected. I'll look into them.