Julio Cesar Matias
Julio Cesar Matias
> 1 - I'm not sure but can try to ask. > 2 - I am assuming so as it works fine with BF. > Here is screen cap of...
> Not showing up with battery connected also. How sad, I don't know why it didn't work, I did everything correctly in PR #671
which .hex file did you send the guy to test? Mine or NerdCopter?
I was downloaded and looked at NerdCopter .hex file, and the one he uploaded is smaller than mine. Are you sure you sent mine? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87a37/87a3702d234c8f74341acfedef5122cdce8db700" alt="Captura de tela 2021-08-23 225947"
ok @BeauBrewski and @nerdCopter , so i don't know anymore why it doesn't work.
> So this may improve landing detection reliability for multirotors but does it also increase the likelihood of false detection/disarms ? I promise you that I will test this over...
> This function has shown to consistently _reduce_ the time taken for auto disarm to occur on un-level ground and in windy conditions, when compared to the current gyro method......
ok, now this model only works in multirotors.
This works really well, I've tested it too... For me this could already be merged!
> The problem with this is it's all about detection safety margins which are currently set on the conservative side to avoid false detection. > > I've just tested the...