Jonathan Lindegaard Starup
Jonathan Lindegaard Starup
it isnt a java call parsing wise - once we add `f.f` as a struct field / java field, the completer can use that? - otherwise, i think the parsing...
I think it will be double work to fix it before we add `f.f` as valid syntax. ill put it on the top of my list
short term, `f.f` is unambiously a java field lookup no? before the Dot trait
yeah it was fixed
We could also check that it is IO exactly
like ```x `put` thing```?
A `Ref` is a struct now-ish, so I guess `ref.value = thing` would work
yeah good question. I think for ref its just upsides to expose it
When structs exists, usage of `Ref` is probably a lot rarer
We could also add `Indexable` with unit and parser shorthand. `r[] = 2` and `r[]` 😄