Jonathan Shor

If you have cells you suspect are intermediate state cells in your original dataset, you could try removing those and running the method on the remainder. This might allow the...

Aaah, how I miss this from SublimeText. @KristoforMaynard, your work was really appreciated! I came here hoping I might be able to contribute, but my JS experience is about zero,...

> I'll fix this shortly. In the meantime, please use: > > ``` > stats.wilcoxon(A, method='approx') > ``` > > The problem is just with `method='auto'` (and `method='exact'` if there...

> What is the shape of the input, and does it have NaNs? Try `stats.wilcoxon(A, _no_deco=True)` if you want a speed boost, but it will behave as though it omits...

I went ahead and tried `_no_deco=True` since omitting NaNs is my desired behavior, and I'm not seeing a slight benefit, I'm seeing almost two orders of magnitude speed up! I...

Getting away from using `datetime.timedelta` is the direct approach, but not being familiar with MNE internals & existing dependencies I was unsure what replacement would make the most sense. Using...

`np.timedelta64` looks better, but still just pushes the problem down to smaller precisions. "Bad" sample rates (300Hz) still fail. > but then your annotations depend on sampling rates (filtering, resampling,...

> see my message in #12324 Interesting. In my local fix, I use a tolerance parameter to determine when post-.set_annotations or ._crop_by_annotations Annotations 'onset' or 'duration' values should be overwritten...