Jonas Toth

@gcampbell-msft I did investigate the issue and patched the plugin locally to get it "running". The following findings hopefully help to work on this issue. This is right now a...

thank you for the patch! i believe the things i commented on could move into a different ebuild-version that closer tracks master. the normal pattern is `9999` that may suffice...

Sorry for beeing so unclear. The ebuild for the tagged Version has elements of a live/snapshoted ebuild in it. I thought it makes sense to create a live ebuild but...

> I authored the latest ebuild. It is a snapshot as the release 3.0.1 was made just before a commit that fixed a bunch of failing tests -- it's basically...

> I have updated the ebuild to ship 3.0.3 as that's the newest stable. It does not include the extra code for patched ebuild compatibility. Thanks, thats great! > If...

> For me doing snapshot ebuilds is simpler than patching in some commits but I am willing to work with patches if that is what you prefer -- I'll get...

> With reluctance, I'll merge it with some fixups, but please investigate my comments. I will look into the issues. I did check the tests definition of upstream and they...

> > With reluctance, I'll merge it with some fixups, but please investigate my comments. > > I will look into the issues. I did check the tests definition of...