Jon Rowe
Jon Rowe
Closing due to inactivity during the monorepo migration, but if someone wanted to revisit this they'd be welcome.
Its hard to guard against collisions because its "a feature not a bug" your supposed to be able to define overridden lets and they are just methods, In the case...
Closing as not planned during the monorepo migration, but if someone wanted to work on something for registering reserved names...
Theres a couple of gems that offer functionality in this area, `rspec-retry` (https://github.com/NoRedInk/rspec-retry) is the closest to what you want (but theres also `rspec-rerun` and `respec`) and looks like you...
> those projects are only (or mainly) focused just on rerunning the specs, not on tracking stats or anything else Correct but the one I linked to gives you the...
Closing due to inactivity (during the monorepo migration) as there are workarounds
Oof, I think this is a long overlooked hangover from 2.x to 3.x when we essentially renamed the pending example behaviour to skipped (where as it used to be a...
Turns out my memory fails me and this count includes both skipped and "passing" pending examples, as they're both in the output for pending, so to seperate this we'd need...
Output wise I prefer `1 example, 0 failures, 0 pending, 1 skipped`, if we can unmark examples as pending when skipped I think we should but I'm not entirely certain...
Closing due to inactivity during the monorepo migration, but if someone wanted to revisit this they'd be welcome.