JohnnyWyles
JohnnyWyles
https://app.osmosis.zone/pool/789 Requesting add to frontier Assetlist pull request here: https://github.com/osmosis-labs/assetlists/pull/192
Allows use of stJUNO/JUNO and seJUNO/JUNO in the router by including pools with at least 10,000 JUNO present to be used.
stATOM is missing on both main frontend and frontier when ATOM is selected (as is default) Also occurs with stSTARS, stJUNO and seJUNO when non-liquid assets are selected, but stATOM...
## Background As passed in [Proposal 733](https://daodao.zone/gov/osmosis/proposals/733) this would stop incentive distribution to Classic pools that will receive less than 0.01 OSMO equivalent value at epoch. This reduces the calculations...
## Background Osmosis charges 100 USDC for pool creation to the community pool. This is a spam prevention measure, as well as a barrier to pool creation that may not...
### What happened? Wasm messages `MsgAddCodeUploadParamsAddresses` and `MsgRemoveCodeUploadParamsAddresses` are newly available. These add the ability to append or remove specific addresses from the wasm params on chain rather than resubmitting...
## Background Liquidity positions transferred to the community pool by transferring the position to osmo1jv65s3grqf6v6jl3dp4t6c9t9rk99cd80yhvld are unable to be recovered by governance for later adjustment. Using a proposal to transfer...
## Background There is currently no mechanism to burn tokens on Osmosis. One is required to account for the additional OSMO generated during the mistiming of the thirdening event this...
## Background This issue is to action [Proposal 671](https://www.mintscan.io/osmosis/proposals/671) > Under the current tokenomic design, OSMO liquidity rewards are mainly allocated to Supercharged pools, as these cater for the majority...
## Background Osmosis governance passed [Proposal 682](https://www.mintscan.io/osmosis/proposals/682) to allow Osmosis specific costs to be set in USDC denominations rather than OSMO. > This proposal would signal the adjustment of all...