Joerg Heinicke

While debugging I found that sub types added via @JsonSubTypes are stored entirely differently than the ones registered programmatically. This itself makes me a little bit suspicious about the correct...

Not sure what kind of input, feedback or support is required. On registering the first is currently considered, additional ones are ignored. I would also be fine with throwing exception.

Usually you seem to fix regressions quite quickly (e.g., 4.17.1, 4.20.1). Any intention to fix this issue soonish? Also, I don't see any workaround at the moment (other than the...

This issue has been confirmed to be a regression more than 2 months ago. Is there any reason why it is not being fixed?

Any intention to address this false positive?

@cowtowncoder, it actually looks like this issue has been fixed ages ago: https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/2515, timewise even 1 yr before I reported this issue. Back then we were still using 2.10.5 though...

In https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/2515 commit https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/commit/3ac186c506f4180e22ac4e75b7cfd5bc5e6c6c2c is referenced.

@philsttr, sorry to approach you directly, but you seem kind of the main/ only maintainer of this project. Thanks! Is there a chance for this PR to get applied within...