Joan Zapata

Feel free to submit a pull request on this. :)

(For what I can say, in my [usecase](https://github.com/JoanZapata/base-adapter-helper/blob/master/base-adapter-helper-sample/src/main/java/com/joanzapata/android/twitter/TwitterFragment.java#L51), nothing has to be reinjected so everything work as expected.) The only thing that changes is the parent activity, is there any...

> We should close this issue then I don't think so, it's relevant in some specific cases.

> If the fragment is never destroyed (...) That's not what `setRetainInstance(true)` does, the Fragment **is** destroyed when the holder activity gets destroyed, or back stacked, etc... It will only...

When would be the good time to configure a singleton scoped `@Rest` service ?

I'll explain a little bit more. :) I think the current best "workaround" is to have an singleton scoped `@EBean` that wraps the `@Rest` class. The `@EBean` can configure the...

Yep, that would be a lot better, I think we agree that the code which **uses** the `@Rest` service shouldn't have to worry about the configuration anyway.

Yeah that's what I used in some places, but here's a few limitations with this method : - If the existing task with this `id` has the same `serial` than...

If the activity gets destroyed while in the backstack, using `isChangingConfigurations()` we would clear the Dynamo, while using `isFinishing()` we would not. Not sure what's the best way to go...

Thanks for the detailed answer. About `Views`, I think it would be easier to deal with it if dynamos were able to have children. The `View` / `Fragment` dynamo would...