JeromeJu
JeromeJu
Thanks Billy for the eyes on here. > with how PipelineResources are being handled The `resources` field is handled in the way of being serialized into the annotations when converted...
This comment notes down the `minimal` feature flag validation discussed in https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/pull/5219#discussion_r932170481 - [ ] Add `minimal` feature flag validation for v1 pipelineRun https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/issues/5355
/close
As this is a large PR and the changes are copied from v1beta1, put [this PR for visualization](https://github.dev/JeromeJu/pipeline/pull/18/files) for easier comparison.
Thanks @dibyom, squashed and retested.
Drafted the [doc WIP for PSP migration](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Xu8WPDym-d1zu5pwtUwBmLDAv9Dl8H7uwclTSfYB2e0/edit?usp=sharing). According to the references in the doc, here are the aspects according to current PSP that PSA might not cover: - The seLinux...
I think we should go for the 1st option in [the doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Xu8WPDym-d1zu5pwtUwBmLDAv9Dl8H7uwclTSfYB2e0/edit) of using PSA with OPA as complement for some of the specifications eg. `seLinux` `supplementalGroup` `fsGroup` as the...
> > > > Ok! I am worried I will not be able to start to implement it immediatly because I will be a little busy for my work in...