Jeremy Ruston

Hi @rimi there has been some recent discussion about the need for the server side to be able to control which tiddlers are exposed via `GET /recipes/default/tiddlers.json?filter=`, and this might...

> @Jermolene my only concern is whether users could just override this by creating a tiddler called `$:/config/Server/GlobalExclusionFilter` and whether that would matter? That's true, but I think that that...

> @Jermolene a configurable mechanism like this seems like a good idea in addition to the other changes we have made. Now that we've applied the temporary fix to system...

Thanks @rimi @saqimtiaz apologies but now that I look again at this PR I'm unclear on the purpose of this change. What are the situations where one would want to...

Hi @Arlen22 I notice that this PR weighs in at +4KB, which I think is problematic given that it doesn't it doesn't provide benefits with the integrated syncadaptor. I am...

Thanks @Arlen22, that's a good improvements in the code size delta. However, it is still 2KB so I wondered if there was any scope for further refactoring so that syncadaptor...

Hi @twMat Changing the titles of docs tiddlers is problematic. It breaks any existing links that might be out there. In this case, there are 4 backlinks to "Importing Tiddlers'...

Hi @danielo515 the problem here is that we already use the "options" parameter that is passed into `SaverHandler.prototype.saveWiki()` in the call to `this.wiki.renderTiddler()`. If we now also pass the same...

Thanks @zorrox1024. I think it is reasonable for users to want Zotero links to work within TiddlyWiki. I wonder whether we might take this as an opportunity to refactor the...

> > Should we just use `\s+:` or `[^:]+:` here? > > I prefer to this solution. I should depends on browser or Desktop OS setting, which schema is supported....