Jeremy Rand
The Tokenview explorer contains fraudulent links: * Whitepaper (links to Narayanan's paper) * Facebook (links to Sudoquai's page) * YouTube (links to Sudoquai's page) I complained to Tokenview about this...
The main page contains: > Official anouncements will also be made on [this BitcoinTalk thread](https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=236340.0). My impression (both from browsing BitcoinTalk and from talking to people who pay more attention...
https://www.namecoin.org is also now available at https://namecoin.bit/ . We should investigate linking the two domains somehow. For example: * Adding an `` link in the footer. * Adding a `Link...
The r/Namecoin subreddit's [old description](https://old.reddit.com/r/Namecoin/) has a bunch of problems: 1. Too much focus on currency applications. 2. Too much focus on censorship resistance and not enough on MITM resistance....
[A wiki article on "Register and Configure .bit Domains" exists](https://web.archive.org/web/20170509035421/https://wiki.namecoin.org/index.php?title=Register_and_Configure_.bit_Domains); we should move the good parts to the Jekyll site and burn the Mostly Unsourced Bullshit (TM).
We should add docs from http://jamie3vkiwibfiwucd6vxijskbhpjdyajmzeor4mc4i7yopvpo4p7cyd.onion/blog/namecoin-bit-domain/ to Namecoin.org. (The content is copyright Jamie Scaife, and is available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license.)
The FAQ should add an entry that compares Namecoin with ENS.
We should add a draft GSoC 2020 page, and amend the GSoC 2019 page stating that we decided not to apply.
See this Reddit comment for a suggested comparison: https://www.reddit.com/r/zeronet/comments/b9mfgq/why_does_zeronet_uses_namecoin/eldv9so?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x
It would be useful to add a FAQ entry comparing Namecoin and OpenTimestamps, given that in my experience there seems to be significant user confusion about how the two systems...