JD comments

Results 26 comments of

JD

always show"Current best: No results returned yet"

Please use protobuf version 2.6 and it works. Here is a snippet from my `pip freeze`: ``` numpy==1.14.0 protobuf==2.6.0 scipy==0.18.0 ```

Reduce extreme (argmin, argmax, min, max etc) enhancement in case of inner dim

@atamazov Can you please help review this?

Reduce extreme (argmin, argmax, min, max etc) enhancement in case of inner dim

@seungmanhan Please resolve the conflicts.

Reduce extreme (argmin, argmax, min, max etc) enhancement in case of inner dim

@atamazov Can we push this PR forward ? You can highlight the support you need from the PR dev here as well.

Reduce extreme (argmin, argmax, min, max etc) enhancement in case of inner dim

@junliume We can merge this PR as soon as the CI passes.

Implement getitem backward

@amberhassaan Have your review comments been addressed ?

Implement getitem backward

@atamazov Any final opinions before we merge this?

Basic mechanism for tuning in ExecutePrimitive

It can surely wait! On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 4:08 PM Vasilii Filippov ***@***.***> wrote: > ***@***.**** commented on this pull request. > ------------------------------ > > In test/gtest/execute_primitive.cpp >...

Request to Add Attention Kernel to MIOpen

@CAHEK7 That is correct.

Supported formats combinations for convolution

Hello @densamoilov Indeed, that is the case. I assume the combination of layouts you are asking about would not be performant. Can you elaborate on the use case for such...