Jake Wharton
Jake Wharton
Why can't you remove the existing ones? 2.0.0 is calling!
I read #9. I don't think you should make the public API suffer because someone is forced to handle configuration changes. You could easily add the config change port/land column...
You also tried before lol #2077. Hopefully this time it lands!
> On a side note, it seems like the language itself needs a mechanism for "soft-deprecation" Maybe `DeprecationLevel.NOTE`? Or `INFORMATIVE`?
I'm having a hard time seeing the proposed function signature as being more clear than having users do what the implementation does. As far as I can tell all it...
So I guess the one thing that `statefulTransform` has over using the `flow` factory is that it's an extension of `Flow` allowing you to Not Break The Chain™. In that...
Er, whoops the implementation of that function was just a placeholder I was supposed to replace before sending! The real one needs to be slightly more complicated as the lambda...
Been following this from the HYBI mailing list. I wish they'd address more of the design flaws of the protocol as part of this.
I haven't been paying that close attention so I'm not sure. Mostly just interested in it because web sockets are giant inefficient balls of terrible with the XOR-ing of bytes...
Just throwing my external tool-based solution in the ring: https://github.com/JakeWharton/qbt-tracker-hound. It maintains a tag for torrents with no functioning trackers. Would of course prefer a built-in solution, though!