Jake Wharton
Jake Wharton
I'm not sure how that's related to null body handling. Feel free to file a separate issue with a failing test case. On Wed, Apr 17, 2019, 9:41 PM Rodion...
No. That's #2867
That is not related to this issue. It's #2867.
This issue has nothing to do with 204 handling and when it's fixed 204 handling won't have changed in any way. That's #2867.
Because it doesn't provide the necessary info
That is the expected behavior for that return type.
Feel free to give it a shot On Tue, Feb 25, 2020, at 5:31 AM, Michał Sikora wrote: > Is it something that is open for a PR or do...
Are you asking for the actual instance or just the service class?
This is really easy to add, but I just want to make sure I understand completely what you want so I can try to balance it with any and all...
I think we'll add both the class and the instance.