Jaifroid

@benoit74 Thanks for the info. It's good news we're getting this ZIM-level support for a propper dark theme! To answer your question, I _could_ if necessary get the info I...

Regarding the name of any metadata key (should it be decided to include it), I think we need to have a slightly more precise and future-proof name than `X-NightModeEnabled` (doesn't...

@benoit74 That's a very well expressed summary, and yes, it's what I was suggesting. I think the reader would generally interpret absence of the key to be equivalent to `X-ColorScheme:...

@kelson42 I respect your perspective on this, but kindly explain how exactly the ZIM scraper can provide a UI for the user to select the dark or light modes they...

As there are plenty of other protocols, like `magnet:`, `maps:`, `zoomus:` and indeed an infinity of such protocols that Web manifests can define for Web apps, it might be worth...

Thinking about it, comparing the protocols / URI Scheme could be problematic in a few situations: * There are protocols that should be handled internally, like `javascript:` (inline JS in...

It would be great to have a theme module that would apply different CSS according to the user's choice, including the dark-themed variants. There were some initial ideas towards this...

So, these sections are actually in the HTML, but their display is set to none:  If we forcibly unhide them, we get: 

At scrape time, all elements with `style.display = 'none';` could remove the `none`, which effectively opens them, and allows the browser to decide whether to display as `inline` or `block`....

Additionally, I don't see the thinking stream when I add `gemini-2.5-flash-preview-04-17` to `GOOGLE_MODELS`, though it appears to be "thinking" because it takes a rather long time to respond.