Jakub Kuczys

As a workaround, you can set it to repeat on last day of the month: 

I like that the `ignore` crate has all of the functionality I described in the issue description built-in - it supports `.gitignore` files at all directory levels of the repository,...

Personally I'm mostly missing a way to ignore files only on my system, in projects where I don't have significant enough stake to change the exclusions they've set up. At...

I was asking for a change in the *default* behavior of the `End` key such that: - it moves the cursor to the end of the current editing line, if...

The relevant functions: https://github.com/PowerShell/PSReadLine/blob/9e7b1fe5249588a3814ae8f8e8ac3a96df48210c/PSReadLine/Movement.cs#L17-L34 https://github.com/PowerShell/PSReadLine/blob/9e7b1fe5249588a3814ae8f8e8ac3a96df48210c/PSReadLine/Movement.cs#L49-L66

Sooo, after the bot auto-adds "Resolution-No Activity", the issue basically needs to have a new comment at least once a week to prevent it from getting closed (unless someone removes...

> It looks like the release automation is [a pre-requirement](https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil/pull/1130#issuecomment-1808635487) for the 2.8.3 release That seems to already be a thing though?: https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil/blob/master/.github/workflows/publish.yml [Committed 2 years ago.](https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil/commit/6b337ea412d399fb48771c544b1a6880763b46c6)

I agree with the trusted publishing thing but if the current setup actually works, it's less work from the maintainer to use that than to review a PR adding trusted...

Is the issue that you're having here that the command output is selectable? Or is it that it's styled the same as the command itself? Or is it about the...

@fkorotkov should I make a new issue for what I described in the previous comment?