JP
JP
@brynrhodes - Looks to me that this is a request that would require updating the CQL spec. I don't think CQL has a story for this currently. Something like: ```...
Discussed with Bryn on a side-channel. This would require a change to the CQL specification and will be under consideration for the CQL 2.0 spec. So while it's not being...
Potentially resolved by #1243. Will retest.
Not fixed by #1243. :)
Resolved by cqframework/cql-engine#462
Whoops. Had too many tabs open.
The annotations work for JSON because of an opposite bug: https://github.com/DBCG/cql_engine/issues/453
The fix for this is probably either adding a specific resolution for that type here: https://github.com/DBCG/cql_engine/blob/master/engine.fhir/src/main/java/org/opencds/cqf/cql/engine/fhir/model/R4FhirModelResolver.java#L129 Or generalizing the mapping logic to support inner types here: https://github.com/DBCG/cql_engine/blob/master/engine.fhir/src/main/java/org/opencds/cqf/cql/engine/fhir/model/FhirModelResolver.java#L199 I need to...
We have a couple DateTime bugs in-flight, one was resolved with https://github.com/cqframework/clinical_quality_language/pull/1259. I'm going to take another look at this once https://github.com/cqframework/clinical_quality_language/pull/1269 lands.
@Capt-Mac - Can you take a look at this? DateTime fixes were merged into CQL. Based on the spec here I'd say that the millisecond-level output is correct: https://build.fhir.org/operation-measure-evaluate-measure.html