Jannik Hollenbach
Jannik Hollenbach
Hi @rahulkiit, thats definitely a bug. Unfortunatly not a easy one to fix as the memory limits for hooks are currently fixed and can't be adjusted on a per hook...
> LGTM. To be merged in v4. Note to include in v4 changelog: > > > The container autodiscovery will not find the scans with the old name and thereby...
awesome 👍 A couple of notes while going over the adr: 1. Parsers don't save the finding into a file in the filesystems but return it directly as a function...
Hi @darox tried to reproduce the error but wasn't able to. Can you post some additional information on what you scanned and maybe even post the (anonymized) raw results /...
Closing this as I can't reproduce it. If you have more information feel free to repoen 🙏
The clarification made it more confusing to me 😅 What do you mean when you say "integration on the level of a scanner"? Also would it be "enough" for this...
Hi 👋 again thanks for the feedback, it always very helpful to hear where the pain points are 🙏 Short answer: No, it currently not possible to change the naming...
Yeah at the moment none of our containers, and as far as I know, any scanner we integrate with supports windows nodes. Totally agree that we should mark them with...
Hi again 👋 Thanks for the detailed report and examples, much appreciated 🙏 Really merging the secureCodeBox findings and DefectDojo findings is unfortunately so hard that its as good as...
I don't think that will be possible, as this would require that our DefectDojo exporter code would have to split up the raw results (e.g. the XML Output from nmap)...