Joan Josep
Joan Josep
> I'd quite like to see this and #8480 merged, but this PR is still quite large and unwieldy to review. Could you break it up into several smaller PRs...
> When working on my big calendar PR, I had a similar concern to you about reviewers knowing it's part of a larger project, but @TrueBrain talked me out of...
> From my review of the commits (mostly looking at titles and only skimming the contents of each), here's how you might break it up: > > 1. `Codechange: Use...
You can mark ca-ES as done.
> I like the direction/idea, but in shouldn't hangars be proper "stand alone" depots? So, a depot order always has a DepotID, and a depot is not a MP_STATION tile,...
> Hi @J0anJosep! Sorry for dropping the ball on reviewing this PR. I have some more time on my hands in the foreseeable future, and if you're still willing, I'd...
> Hi @J0anJosep, I hope you're doing well. Whenever you have time, I'm happy to keep working with you on this. 😃 I'll get in contact with you soon. Probably...
> > the current behavior is that any new built aircraft is built in the first hangar, so it is a no change/not a drawback. > This is not true?...
> I tried this PR. Hangars still seem to be separate: they show different vehicles and I can buy new aircraft in one or the other. What am I missing?...