ISibboI

Thanks for the reply! * For the usefulness: I think every collection-like data type should implement iterators over its elements. It seems more rusty to me to be able to...

Yeah I can do that. Should have time for that latest next week.

I changed things around and now we have a `BitsIter` It's almost perfect, but rust doesn't allow to add the `.iter()` method to `Bits`. So it is now in `BitVec`....

That is a good idea! If we set the current types as default, it might even stay backwards compatible. On Sat, 30 Jul 2022, 11.31 Jan Vincent Liwanag, ***@***.***> wrote:...

That's a nice idea. I am unsure though if I want to implement this as a new syntax or simply as a builtin function. What do you think about e.g....

Thank you for your interest in implementing this! I actually thought about the dot notation (`(1, 2).0`) before, but it was not trivial to implement because the dot is also...

At the moment that is not possible the way you wrote it. Albeit as a hack, you can add a function `if` to your context, that has three arguments. First...

Sure. If it is something bigger, we might want to discuss it first though. On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 7:00 PM Jacob LeCoq ***@***.***> wrote: > Are you accepting...

Thanks, this looks interesting. I think though that it is better if there is just one `get_value()` method, so we should replace the return type of the existing method, rather...

Hi, sorry, so I think there was a misunderstanding. I would prefer having a function `get_value(&self, &identifier) -> Option