Ang

@yeelauren Thanks so much! Really looking forward to the review process 🙌

Hi @yeelauren, Thanks for the heads-up last week! Is there any update on the pre-review checks? Let me know if you need anything from me. Thanks!

Hi @mpadge, thanks for your feedback. In terms of broader data use: group-level analysis is possible when multiple users authorize access, which is how team-based or collaborative athlete studies can...

Hi @mpadge, Thank you very much for your time and the detailed, thoughtful feedback on my pre-submission inquiry. I sincerely appreciate the guidance on both fixing the issue template and,...

Hi @mpadge, Hope you are doing well. Following up on our previous discussion about my `Athlytics` package, I've taken your feedback on its scientific utility to heart. I've since found...

Hi @mpadge, Thank you so much for your quick and very encouraging response. I'm delighted to hear that the new framing for `Athlytics` aligns well with rOpenSci's scientific goals. I...

Hi @mpadge, Just wanted to follow up gently on our discussion from last week regarding the "Athlytics" package. I was very encouraged by your positive feedback on the new direction....

Hi @mpadge, Thank you for the update, that's very kind of you. I'll gladly wait to hear from the team next week, so please don't feel any rush. The conversation...

Hi @mpadge, Thank you so much for the wonderful news. I'm thrilled to hear that the editorial team supports `Athlytics` for a full review. I truly appreciate all your guidance...

Hi @mre, it looks like the stale bot closed this automatically. The project now has 32 stars (surpassing the 20-star requirement) and is approaching the 3-month maturity mark. Could you...