HyperPeek

cant reproduce on 4.3.2.1

I like and support the idea although given the current strict implementation of rvn this will require another hard-fork.

This needs more information -- could not reproduce

I guess 2. and 3. should be RVNTEST asset swaps? As you pointed out this looks tricky to solve, although it should clearly be possible, as from the chain the...

Excellent finding. I looked into properly checking the size of the script when looking for a solution to our p2sh issue, but that turned out to be not easy as...

I am not sure how difficult it will be with the usage of the bytes for restricted assets / qualifiers. We can not simply enforce the size bytes and suddenly...

Interesting Idea. This would probably have to be implemented as a separate Asset type, as the current "unique" requires a root asset upon creation https://github.com/RavenProject/Ravencoin/blob/9def8ed6b5aa6f8d6aa3a53436197233941d7e17/src/assets/assets.cpp#L956 This probably means a fork,...

Should be added in #909 will close once confirmed working as expected

A doc with a description of the hotfix would be great. Even if we just froze the dev-branch for the upcomming audit and release on master (means a PR wont...

I suggest to close this once we are happy with current installation instruction.