HypeMC

Results 67 comments of HypeMC

@nicolas-grekas Good idea, I've created a [followup PR](https://github.com/symfony/symfony-docs/pull/19814) since this one targets 5.4, and the feature was introduced in 6.4.

@javiereguiluz Yep, everything looks ok, I see you've also merged the follow up PR.

Yep, this was introduced in #52917, before the changes the `ObjectNormalizer` would access the property using the property access component: https://github.com/symfony/symfony/blob/5f7ee321a3bb7c12dae44980c3856b49efb48941/src/Symfony/Component/Serializer/Normalizer/ObjectNormalizer.php#L140-L147 But now the `isAllowedAttribute()` method filters out `bar.id`, so...

@th-lange Maybe I misunderstood your issue, but the reason you're getting the "incorrect" response is that you're using the `$example` variable for two different purposes. After the first call to...

> > `autoconfigure: false # This is needed so that it's not included in the default serializer` > > Maybe could we tweak the autoconfigurator to automatically exclude definitions already...

> > @mtarld It didn't make sense to use the same name for two different concepts. standard normalizers/encoders aren't linked to the default serializer. They are services added to all...

> Rebase needed after #58013 @chalasr Done

> fabbot's suggestion looks legit, can you apply it? @chalasr Done, https://github.com/symfony/symfony/compare/d9ceb8521073610eff9d338eea2a5558d3edbbc5..03534988f5e9cef66798ab9b36d38cdf3770e671

@heiglandreas Could you create a minimum reproducer?

@heiglandreas Could you pleas see if #57110 fixes your issue.