HotwheelsSisyphus

> Also, the idea was that you could start a recorder with different setting than the server – `Recorder` should be decoupled from `Server` from the perspective of `Recorder`. The...

I've looked at it for slightly longer and it's definitely more than just one line that needs to be added (even though mostly just copypasting that one line into the...

>> record flac and wav simultaneously, who knows. >Oh, is this not possible? Apologies, you are right, this is indeed possible... I used the wrong example there. The main example...

Again, the one thing that is genuinely "wrong" in my opinion is this: ``` a = s.recorder; b = Recorder(s); a.numChannels = 1; b.numChannels = 5; a.prepareForRecord(); a.numChannels // ->...

@telephon, just to follow up (btw I don't consider this to be urgent at all): 1. For the "wrong" behavior of the numChannels variable, see the last post; 2. The...

here's a bit of testing. Apparently it's not limited to that [-2 , -1] range after all, and happens basically with any step size not a multiple of 0.5 ```...

> This is unsurprising behavior. When you put it like that ;) ... but still it's not what I want to be thinking about when I try to make noises....

Thanks, very welcome addition! I'll try to look this over properly within the next few days. For now, two quick questions: 1. Have you maybe discussed the "information"-quasi-tag (that you...

> I tested `thisProcess.interpreter.executeFile(path, arg1, arg2)` and found no clear advantage compared with load. It may be that my understanding does not encompass its intended use. > > So..., incorporating...

Sorry, I misunderstood. > I cannot envisage a practical use case for this I don't know, maybe in some setup contexts where you pass certain parameters (e.g., info about hardware,...