HotwheelsSisyphus

I don't have a strong opinion on this, but 1. personally I haven't noticed any cases where the human-generated numbering was wrong (or all that important, even)... and 2. I'd...

I did see that, but so far my experience with writing classes in sc has been limited to simpler cases... so I'm not sure if I can give the best...

To clarify, I raised the issue because it came up during review in another PR. I didn't check whether it was a known issue so if that is the case,...

> update style guide, accepting both indentation styles, and indicating that the IDE applies one of them Leaning slightly toward this... the main reason is that indentation in method chains...

Ah, thanks! That would make sense, and it may be what the 0 in here was intended for. The doc for RootNode also mentions that not adding nodes to RootNode...

Oh, no problem, I can do that. By the "kinds of changes", I assume you meant the classlib and the help changes?

> * re: `By default, this is the default group 1.` in the suggested change - is that true? Isn't this actually group 0 / root node? > This means,...

> (though the result is the same unless one starts putting synths outside of the default group) I think, for instance, the SafetyNet limiter happens after Group 1 but not...

sure, will do so later today! > Le 19 nov. 2025 à 14:49, Marcin Pączkowski ***@***.***> a écrit : > > > @dyfer commented on this pull request. > >...

yup, that makes sense. was worth a try anyway. I figure here someone more experienced needs to make a call as to the acceptable tolerance. The test is (0,2.0001..8) so...