HonkingGoose
HonkingGoose
I noticed you're still using Docusaurus 1: https://github.com/prettier/prettier/blob/493f393ac7fd4b072a00d6600587308cde32b010/website/package.json#L21 The developers of Docusaurus 2 are confident that it's ready for mainstream adoption now, as they state on their blog post here:...
## Problem description The `packages/*/package.json` files lack the `"directory"` property in their `"repository"` object. Example of a `package.json` file that's missing this property: https://github.com/conventional-changelog/conventional-changelog/blob/21b73f974adc4490a318d9c892055655cb82c538/packages/conventional-changelog-angular/package.json#L9-L12 I think this is the reason...
### What would you like Renovate to be able to do? In PR #16270 I tried to add documentation about _why_ Renovate doesn't support Ruby on Rails gems correctly. @rarkins...
## Changes - Use simpler words - Add better explanations - Explain who does what ## Context Drive-by PR. I think this needed a rewrite. 😄 ## Documentation (please check...
### Describe the proposed change(s). Over on the Octoclairvoyant repository, I stumbled into a possible speed up for the Prettier run in the CI. [^octoclairvoyant-repo] Pasting the conversation: > We...
### Describe the proposed change(s). ## Intro I wrote some GitHub issue search queries that help us check if any issues are wrongly labeled. Maybe we can automate this task,...
## Changes - Rewrite page: - Use simple words and phrases - Use lists - Improve link name to our `pep440` implementation - Rewrite paragraphs to be easier to understand...
**What would you like Renovate to be able to do?** The package Luxon 2 was upgraded with PR #10905, and all tests pass. So we don't _have to_ make further...
### Describe the proposed change(s). We're using the old term "master issue" in the filenames for the Dependency Dashboard test fixtures. I think we should rename those files, like this:...
**What would you like Renovate to be able to do?** Copy/paste of comment from @rarkins in discussion #10585. > I would definitely like to parse `gemspec` files, but only using...