HenrikJannsen

See also https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq2/issues/1361, https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq2/issues/1546 , https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq2/issues/1866, https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq2/issues/1876

> 1. Do we need the Bisq Multisig for the Lightning protocol? Yes. It we need to port the Bisq Multisig to Liquid first and that will be part of...

I think easiest is to add an output to the one who does the redirect tx so in case the tx does not get confirmed in time they can boost...

Also would like to give credit to @sqrrm . I think he was the first one who came up with the idea quite some time back....

> The benefit is that it would remove funds from being locked indefinitely either through both users being non responsive or in case where one user is non responsive and...

We could add a further improvement to make reimbursement cases even less likely. With the above idea we solve the problem of non-responding traders. Then all the funds can be...

> dis-incentivized to accept the mediation proposal Yes that's a good point. I agree that overall the proposed addition is not worth it and might even make it worse. Claim...

I started to work on it but as it turned out at be more complex as initially assumed (it requires an extra roundtrip of messages) and I had limited time...

@stejbac Thats great news!!!! Thank you! Here are my branches: https://github.com/HenrikJannsen/bisq/branches The ones with the enumerations are the work in progress on the protocol change. They are likely missing something...

> In terms of privacy my only concern is the new BM role and how it incentivises contributors to use the same identity again and again. The barrier of entry...