Hajo Rijgersberg

And also here my apologies that I must have forgotten the issues that you created. Correct, these scales were defined as units at the time so that they could be...

Similar goals indeed. Different ontologies, different teams.

Thank you, Markus, these are very good suggestions. In the mean time, I have discussed them within the team, and we are now willing and planning to realize these. I'll...

Finally found time to work on your raised issues. > Suggest a new entrance for Linked Open Vocabularies I have just tried to suggest 'http://www.ontology-of-units-of-measure.org/page/om-2' there, but an error is...

Thanks for the hints. Indeed, if after processing the changes it still doesn't work to suggest the ontology, I'll contact the people of LOV.

Good point. But do you mean that the namespace abbreviation 'om' of OM should be changed? I'm afraid I can't do that (I'm so sorry to say this), but I'm...

Dear people, I thought I could manage the metadata quickly, but it appears to take more time. So I'll look for a new moment next week.

Dear people, It is my honour and pleasure to announce that Bhoomin Pandya has submitted OM to LOV, in a successful way! Please see the above-mentioned issue (https://github.com/HajoRijgersberg/OM/issues/36#). She has...

Thanks, but that's not entirely true: OM has the symbol 'AU'. 'au' is also used a lot in practice, so I should definitely define that symbol too, that's true. Now,...

Just defined 'au' as the symbol of the astronomical unit and added 'AU' as an alternative symbol! Thanks so much, Jan Martin, for diving into this! :)