Scientific Computing (UOL)
Scientific Computing (UOL)
Thanks for the suggestions: tried the `-fno-tree-vectorize` first, unfortunately same result. Going to GCC 13 might be a good idea as it will also supports Zen4 better. So will try...
Some progress: building with GCC 13.1.0 reduces the number of numerical errors to 26, all in the COMPLEX (4) or COMPLEX16 (21) tests. However, the error with code 9 in...
Test summary from building with GCC 13.1 and `-ftree-vectorize`: ``` --> LAPACK TESTING SUMMARY ALL PRECISIONS 4229689 26 (0.001%) 1 (0.000%) ``` There is no difference between `-ftree-vectorize` and `-fno-tree-vectorize`...
Thanks, I will ignore the errors for now and will keep an eye on the future releases of GCC and OpenBLAS.