Hardy Hobeck

Results 163 comments of Hardy Hobeck

> This is not the same behaviour as v5.12.0 which acts appropriately, giving 1.8.0 in all cases. Giving the result of `1.8.0-custom-master.1` back is fully correct in your case why...

![image](https://github.com/GitTools/GitVersion/assets/56404113/bcf8a33e-b65f-4733-92bf-cbce6e5c4de8) ![image](https://github.com/GitTools/GitVersion/assets/56404113/6fffff61-b4a7-40c2-a292-4f6280efea88)

> The results I see are the difference between _any_ flags being passed and _no_ flags being passed. I am using -diag as the simplest example, but both of your...

May I ask you to give us some information about the motivation of this feature? In which scenario you would like to use the information which increment strategy has been...

Hello @ganju001, Could you please give me more information about the context why you need this feature and about the motivation around it? In my opinion the pre-release weight is...

> May I ask you to give us some information about the motivation of this feature? In which scenario you would like to use the information which increment strategy has...

> Why the software have this behaviour? I think you have found a bug. For me it's not clear why this error occurred and also I cannot try/reproduce it because...

Is it possible to provide a git repository or any steps to reproduce the problem? What version have you used before GitVersion 6.0.0-beta2? Could you provide the logs for the...

First of all thank you for creating the test environment. Actually I'm quite busy at this moment and have no time to take a look into your issue. It's also...