Greg Stanton

Hi all! I put together a new approach based on all the discussion so far, and I updated it with feedback based on the meeting. This version supports the following:...

### Updates from the meeting on December 7, 2023: Thanks so much to everyone for attending! During the meeting, we adjusted the latest approach and cleared up our main questions....

Hi @capGoblin! No problem at all, and thanks for all your work! Did you see the update in the body of this issue about the new approach, the task list,...

Pinging @Qianqianye: When I go to create new issues and link them to the task list in the body of this issue, I'd like to apply the "Good First Issue"...

> @GregStanton I've given you triage access to this repo. Thanks @limzykenneth!

Hi all. There's a lot of creative discussion going on here! I have a different view of this, but I could be wrong. Basically, I think the native syntax is...

Thanks @nickmcintyre! You make a great point. I totally agree that it's best to seek out the simplest version of `asyc`/`await` for the sake of discussion. And wow. Your latest...

The original proposal mentions keeping the callback syntax if necessary. Does anyone know yet if that'd still be necessary if @nickmcintyre's [latest idea](https://github.com/processing/p5.js/issues/6767#issuecomment-1910421675) is adopted?

Amazing! Thank you so much @Gaurav-1306! And thank you to @Qianqianye for bringing the others into the conversation! **Verbal version of the tutorial** In case it helps anyone, I'll elaborate...

Thanks for your feedback @davepagurek! I'm glad you like the naming. I'm also glad you asked about other APIs. I asked myself the same question, and I think it's good...