Glen De Cauwsemaecker

> I'd need to double check to ensure a build script can figure out what directory it was invoked from That depends on the user. I think you can specify...

@ccding why is this in a dev branch and when will this be moved onto master? And is there something I can do to help this progress faster?

Cool, I'll try to look into it, can't promise I will get further than you though! And I just noticed that your master branch seems to be on par with...

Hello. Is the plan still to implement traverse at some point? Any helpt required for this?

Ok fantastic, going to put it on my personal backlog. Will see if I get to it, thanks for giving me the pointer! For now it's not a blocker, but...

As part of the split effort that might need to happen to solve https://github.com/dizda/fast-socks5/issues/15#issuecomment-1119795209 properly, this might also be solved in one go.

Your DNS resolve disable config was already working fine, just wasn't able to use it. https://github.com/dizda/fast-socks5/pull/24 is now there, so this issue can be closed.

Never mind, in the current flow it is impossible to get the real unresolved address it seems. Would it be allowed in your scope to have something for the server...

Related to this it would be cool if one can do the socket upgrade, and get the auth done and receive header data (e.g. target address). But do the actual...

Could be as simple as: ```diff diff --git a/src/server.rs b/src/server.rs index c49bb07..9a7c307 100644 --- a/src/server.rs +++ b/src/server.rs @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ pub struct Socks5Socket { config: Arc, auth: AuthenticationMethod, target_addr:...