Gitanjali

Results 12 comments of Gitanjali

This is a bug in vtk rendering at the default sliceNormal position [1,0,0] for the sagittal view. Either we fix this in vtk or a hack to fix this from...

@pieper I tested with 180deg rotation option, and the issue still persists. I think we need to look into the vtk side on why it's unable to render with the...

@pieper I did check the IOP tag for the two axial scans with which the issue occurs. The value isnt exactly identity, the axial scan plane is slightly tilted. For...

Thanks @pieper , orthogonalizing the vector before rendering works! So far, I have found two studies with this issue. For the other study, the IOP tag reads: [ 1, -2.01861902193734e-10,...

For orthogonalizing, I am using vtkMath.orthogonalize3x3(). However, if the IPP matrix has the 32-bit float header issue as you mentioned, then there is still some precision error after orthogonalizing, which...

> Updated the description to explain the fix,

@fedorov Please see the investigation details below: This issue was opened to double check the fix done for https://github.com/OHIF/Viewers/issues/2935. What was the bug? Failed to parse the SR display set...

> @GitanjaliChhetri can you please include specific SR samples that you are using to guide the development in this PR and test the revised code? > Included in my response....

@hackermd I do not seem to have permissions to add reviewers to this PR. Please know it's ready for your review. Thanks!

@hackermd I have addressed the requested changes. Please let me know if this can be merged? Thank you.