Sam Claassens
Sam Claassens
Hi, Yes, thanks! We'll change our pattern to make sure all calls end in commits. Appreciate the help, we're pushing the library pretty hard so this really helps.
Yep, I made it simply timestamp, that work for everyone? The automated fields are lastUpdatedTimetstamp and createdTimestamp. On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 1:27 PM Johannes Terblanche < ***@***.***> wrote:...
Specifically, these should be converted to complete structures: - solverDataDict - ppeDict - dataEntry - smallData Reference structure: ``` { "label":"x0", "dataEntry":"{}", "nstime":"0", "dataEntryType":"{}", "ppeDict":"{}", "solverDataDict":"{\"default\":{\"vecval\":[0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0],\"dimval\":3,\"vecbw\":[0.0,0.0,0.0],\"dimbw\":3,\"BayesNetOutVertIDs\":[],\"dimIDs\":[0,1,2],\"dims\":3,\"eliminated\":false,\"BayesNetVertID\":\"_null\",\"separator\":[],\"variableType\":\"RoME.Pose2\",\"initialized\":false,\"infoPerCoord\":[0.0,0.0,0.0],\"ismargin\":false,\"dontmargin\":false,\"solveInProgress\":0,\"solvedCount\":0,\"solveKey\":\"default\"}}", "smallData":"{}", "variableType":"RoME.Pose2", "solvable":1, "tags":"[\"VARIABLE\"]",...
As per #201: > Using solvable in this way means that it's a lower bound when filtering - filtering on solvable=0 means that you'll get both solvable=1 and solvable=0. That...
Thinking about this - if filtering solvable==0 is needed, I'd suggest we don't use the lower limit then. Rather we switch it to an equality check than introduce the array?
My take: Orgs are groups of users - one level higher. We can do an agent renaming, it would be quite invasive because RobotID is used as part of the...
Just going to leave this here: https://www.onthesnow.com/vermont/projected-openings.html Directions: [Google Maps](https://www.google.com/maps/dir/MIT+Computer+Science+%26+Artificial+Intelligence+Laboratory,+Vassar+Street,+Cambridge,+MA/Sugarbush+Resort,+102+Forest+Dr,+Warren,+VT+05674/@43.241348,-73.1080377,8z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1s0x89e370a94526b345:0x303ada1e9664dfed!2m2!1d-71.0904378!2d42.3619407!1m5!1m1!1s0x4cb56d7b952c28bb:0x78dc5cf31c15ff36!2m2!1d-72.8944139!2d44.1359019!3e0) Opening Date: 11/17/2019 Architecture discussion 11/23? @dehann @pvazteixeira @nicrip
Nice!!! Hope you hit some great runs :skier:
Heresy! Actually, yep, we're looking at doing that in RoME as part of the graph duplication. Let's keep this here as a reminder to make sure we do the duplication.