Galaxy4594

**Follow Up:** I did more testing for 0.9.2 and the git master (4da4b9a) versions. Keep in mind I used the same testing methodology from before. I'm using the image metric...

Thanks for the input! I just use metrics as a sanity check to make sure I'm not just seeing things. If you want to focus on the worst case scenario,...

Just a quick follow-up: I’m comparing version 0.10.2 with the latest master version (commit 45e688c) to see how things have changed. I retested the images ultraman.png and tf2_wallpaper.png, both at...

I did a little testing and the the encoding defaults have changed between 0.9 and 0.10. For lossy images, the alpha channel was originally compressed with the same distance as...

My main issue with recent versions of libjxl is the excessive blurring, which is most apparent in nonphotographic images. According to my testing, this happened between versions 0.8 and 0.9,...

> The blurring degradations are likely due to optimized use of the filtering strenght -- now it is L2 + butteraugli tuned instead of tuning by the human eye. Please...

> When I was upgrading the version recently, I encountered some related questions and I hope they can be answered. Under the same volume, has the performance of Photographic image...

I remember `img2webp` and `gif2webp` have a simple heuristic for determining whether lossy or lossless will be smaller when passing the `-mixed` option.

I got it smaller than PNG, 18,125 bytes. I used libjxl 0.8 at effort 10 (todays equivalent of effort 11). The theory is that version has more palette sorting, which...

I already made an issue here a few months ago #3517. But it's still annoying how this simple problem hasn't been fixed. 😔