FrozenCow

What about letting the user decide how Move should work? You could only register atomic movers and leave out the non-atomic ones. That way you on the one hand can...

That sounds like a great use-case for sharpfilesystem. MemoryFileSystem will help out a lot of people for testing. You're right about `Replace`. I haven't noticed that one. No need to...

Nice. I didn't see a mention of atomic properties in https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.io.file.replace(v=vs.110).aspx, that's why I asked. If we have an operation that documents as being atomic, than that's what it should...

I still need to write some documentation on this, though I'm not really sure the current manually 'registering'-approach is the right one. However, I've added a test for Registration that...

> I’m actually more worried about atomic operations than performance myself. What is your specific application? > Wrapping is an issue when trying to implement atomic operations using the registration+extension...

I really wanted this feature too, so I made a pull request. Please check out #63

I have experience with C++ and I have experience with Node/JS. However I don't have any experience writing C++ addons for Node (apart from the PR I did here), so...

Since @lushzero was working on a fork, out of interest I thought I'd look around whether there were other git libraries for node based on libgit2. I found https://github.com/nodegit/nodegit/tree/wip ....

EDIT: replies going fast, this was in a response to @samcday ;) I agree with what @jmendeth just said. Sounds good. We could also decide to start in a separate...

Nice, the files I was wondering what they do are gone. But what's up with the new sgit namespace/module? Should the project be renamed too? What's the purpose behind that...