Franz Heinzmann
Franz Heinzmann
Two questions about the setup in which these errors occur: * Do the nodes in your setup all have stable node ids, or are some nodes that could get a...
> One thing I was wondering: you can already get the endpoint from the node. So what would happen if somebody would just grab an endpoint and then call accept...
> > It seems that the sync engine thinks that it "owns" gossip, so it uses subscribe_all > > @Frando can we change this? seems unfortunate to subscribe to everything...
Closing in favor of #2357
I did not yet give the new gossip dispatcher module a real review, but my first thought is: What about we move the `gossip_dispatcher` from iroh to iroh-gossip? And make...
#2265 changes the sync engine usage of gossip to not use subscribe_all (based on this branch). However as outlined in the previous comment I think I'd prefer to move the...
I think the API is fine. And still very much in favor of having only one and not 2 high level dispatch interfaces to gossip.
Also at least a smoke test for the gossip client API would be good so that we don't break things.
> But - do you think this test for gossip will reliably work? I am connecting two nodes and then send a msg from one to the next. Can there...
I merged #2616 into this branch! `iroh-willow` is now based on `willow-rs`. Will copy-paste the PR description of #2616 because it contains context and notes/TODOs that shouldn't get lost: ##...