Friedrich von Never

I think we could add much better error reporting for this case, but we shouldn't actually compile this code.

I don't know of any difference a C implementation should make between `int` and `signed` according to the standard. But there may be some difference, I'm not sure.

We have a test (`Cesium.CodeGen.Tests.CodeGenOperatorTests.AddIntToChar`) that confirms we still do the aforementioned conversion to `byte` and to `int`. So, nope, this doesn't seem to be complete.

Sure thing. This is a good task for new contributors, because it doesn't require deep knowledge of the existing code. Here's a more detailed explanation. We support several CPU architectures...

Yes, thanks.

I propose to implement the following naming schema for internal types (i.e. the ``). 1. Introduce the concept of _compilation context directory_. All the paths will be resolved relative to...

@kant2002, do you suggest us to add an option for the user to provide the class names for every translation unit? We could add that as an option, but we'll...

Thanks to @a1batross for this suggestion.

We couldn't parse anything beyond that `int`. I doubt we'll get anything better from an auto-generated parser. I'm leaving this open for any ideas, though. Maybe one day we'll rewrite...

Sounds like a lot of work, but in the end, why not. What servers support this authentication scheme?