Alexander Grund

In examining the output I've seen that `SUBCOMMAND: # [action 'Compiling ', configuration: ]` shows differing values for "configuration". For e.g. "5145bac2d59ecd1d49c139f258a492145fb9a97392eff5f5e72d0b94901ca2a6" all action_env values are there but for "10b8e9fd33cf42203bb848e842763cc669d976ce3de802a9b8c5cf443259dc2c"...

I'm not sure it is the same because in my case it is not a genrule that fails but a cc_library. But let's see: Building TF with 1 process only...

That is `--subcommands`, yes. Already using it and lead me to seeing where the action_env is missing. Now I would like to know the rule invocation chain to see where...

Ok, it looks like you were on the right track with #4008. I bisected the TF sources between 2.2 and 2.3 to find the commit which introduced the breaking changed...

Yes. As you noticed in https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/pull/43156#issuecomment-704367191 it isn't clear why and when tools or exec_tools are to be used and if exec_tools would be correct then there needs to be...

This seems to be still an issue with Bazel 4.2.2, noticed with TF 2.8.4 when using CUDA where sometimes the `--action_env`s get ignored and compilation fails to find headers. E.g.:...

Test report by @Flamefire #### Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order) * **SUCCESS** _GROMACS-2020-foss-2019b.eb_ * **SUCCESS** _GROMACS-2021.3-foss-2021a.eb_ * **SUCCESS** _GROMACS-2021.5-foss-2021b.eb_ * **SUCCESS** _GROMACS-2021-foss-2020b.eb_ * **SUCCESS** _GROMACS-2023.1-foss-2022a.eb_ * **SUCCESS** _GROMACS-2023.3-foss-2022a.eb_ *...

Working on that and found more issues with that function

Ok got 2 PRs ready which should fix this and related issues. Turned out it was way harder than anticipated due to support of YEB files that don't have tuples.

I think we should first discuss and settle on a specification of `checksums`. I started a PR at https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild/pull/853 to serve as a basis for discussion. E.g. currently it is...