Jeremiah Senkpiel

Proposal: rename `next()`

2

Due to potential conflicts with `iterator#next()`, perhaps this part of the protocol should be renamed. Any thoughts? Maybe something like `give()`?

Blog about this?

2

I probably have enough material, could be good for visibility?

references: add offset to pull

4

Refs: https://github.com/Fishrock123/bob/issues/23

It could expose `StdioSink(fd)` with shortcuts to fd 1/2 via `StdoutSink` and `StderrSink`. Might be better done outside of this repo.

Organize a meeting

1

I think it would be useful soon have a voice meeting to discuss various unresolved conversations. Things that should be talked about: - Project Approach evaluation - Goals evaluation -...

Make Stream() an async iterator

1

I think Stream() would be a good place for this, what does everyone else think? We should also be sure to handle cases such as https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/28194

Proposal: change binding

8

Binding is ugly and I bet it is the least comprehensible part right now. Ideally I guess it would look something like `Stream(source, transform, sink)`.

potential future move to nodejs org

2

Not really super into moving stuff into an official repo atm but once some more status has been completed (see https://github.com/Fishrock123/bob/issues/2), we may want to so as to get some...

Proposal: add `offset` to `pull()`

7

From the collab summit, after talking with @jasnell extensively about QUIC, I think it would be useful to have pull support an offset to ask the source to read from...

need to do this... currently it's really just done via the C++ passthrough